Mazda Xedos 9 1993 vs Mazda 626 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 - 214 HP | 76 - 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 295 NM | 158 - 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.4 | 6.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is larger. Mazda Xedos 9 is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 22 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`951 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |