Mazda Xedos 9 1993 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 - 214 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 295 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.4 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 9 is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`951 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |