Mazda Xedos 9 2001 vs Opel Omega 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mazda Xedos 9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Opel Omega has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mazda Xedos 9 is available with front wheel drive, while Opel Omega can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 164 HP | 100 - 310 HP | |
Torque: | 212 NM | 203 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 6.6 - 14.0 | |
Mazda Xedos 9 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.88 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
Mazda Xedos 9 is smaller. Mazda Xedos 9 is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Mazda Xedos 9 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`139 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |