Mazda Tribute 2008 vs Ford Escape 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda Tribute and Ford Escape have the same engine power, but Mazda Tribute torque is 79 NM more than Ford Escape. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.8 | |
|
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Tribute consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 934 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1903 litres | 1792 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Escape. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Escape. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Escape has
| |