Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 153 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 12 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Tribute consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 42 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |