Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 38 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda Tribute engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Tribute has 51 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |