Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Tribute) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Mazda Tribute engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 173 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2245 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Mazda Tribute has 153 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 455 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`978 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`455 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 523 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |