Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 38 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Tribute might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Mazda Tribute can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |