Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 33 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Mazda Tribute can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
| |