Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003

 
Mazda Tribute
2004 - 2007
Land Rover Freelander
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP117 HP
Torque: 200 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds12.6 seconds
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda Tribute engine produces 33 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.410.4
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway750 km on highway
560 km with real consumption520 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.44 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.71 m
Mazda Tribute is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 368 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2245 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Mazda Tribute can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9782`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 28003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda Tribute has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv