Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mazda Tribute engine produces 61 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 452 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |