Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Tribute) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 21 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 100 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 4 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 30 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |