Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Tribute consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 42 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |