Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.0 | |
| Mazda Tribute consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Tribute engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mazda Tribute has 42 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |