Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 540 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mazda Tribute can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |