Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Ford Maverick 2004

 
Mazda Tribute
2004 - 2007
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 200 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds10.7 seconds
Mazda Tribute and Ford Maverick have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.411.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway720 km on highway
560 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.44 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.76 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 368 litres985 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2245 litresno data
Ford Maverick has more luggage space.
Mazda Tribute has 617 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick.
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9781`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28002000
Pros and Cons: Mazda Tribute has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Maverick has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv