Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Subaru Forester 2002

 
Mazda Tribute
2001 - 2004
Subaru Forester
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 197 HP230 HP
Torque: 265 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda Tribute engine produces 33 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Subaru Forester.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.8no data
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
430 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.45 m
Width: 1.82 m1.74 m
Height: 1.71 m1.59 m
Mazda Tribute is 5 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 457 litres406 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2245 litres1525 litres
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 720 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight: 2`075 kg2`000 kg
Net weight:1`590 kg1`455 kg
Load capacity:485 kg545 kg
Mazda Tribute load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 32002600
Pros and Cons: Mazda Tribute has
  • roomier boot
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv