Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda Tribute engine produces 5 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 11.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.3 l/100km | 17.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Tribute consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 15 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1954 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Tribute has 475 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Mazda Tribute uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 291 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |