Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Tribute) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 81 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 35 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 15 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1315 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Tribute has 195 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Mazda Tribute uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |