Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Tribute) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Tribute engine produces 83 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 5 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 840 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Tribute has 47 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |