Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 21 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 13.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.3 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Tribute consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is smaller. Mazda Tribute is 19 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 633 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2245 litres | 2020 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 176 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mazda Tribute can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`075 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 760 kg | |
| Mazda Tribute load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 57 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |