Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Ford Escape 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 271 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Escape is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 6 HP less power than Ford Escape, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Ford Escape. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 11.7 | |
| Mazda Tribute consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute and Ford Escape are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 934 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1835 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 477 litres less trunk space than the Ford Escape. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`054 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Escape has
| |