Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 26 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 24 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 159 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 1293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |