Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Tribute engine produces 16 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Tribute could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 42 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |