Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
| Mazda Tribute and Ford Maverick have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Tribute consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Tribute consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute and Ford Maverick are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Mazda Tribute has 617 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |