Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Ford Escape 2000

 
Mazda Tribute
2001 - 2004
Ford Escape
2000 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 124 HP129 HP
Torque: 175 NM183 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds11 seconds
Ford Escape is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda Tribute engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Escape, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Ford Escape. Due to the lower power, Mazda Tribute reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.5
Mazda Tribute consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that by driving the Mazda Tribute over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway660 km on highway
Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.39 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.71 m1.70 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute and Ford Escape are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 368 litres934 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2245 litres1835 litres
Mazda Tribute has 566 litres less trunk space than the Ford Escape. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9151`872
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 3200no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda Tribute has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Escape has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv