Mazda Tribute 2008 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 - 240 HP | 140 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 - 302 NM | 191 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 11.3 | 6.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Patriot. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.64 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1903 litres | 1777 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Tribute has 237 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. The Jeep Patriot may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |