Mazda Tribute 2008 vs Ford Escape 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.3 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 - 240 HP | 145 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 - 302 NM | 136 - 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 11.3 | 9.6 - 10.5 | |
|
On average, the Mazda Tribute petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Escape. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 934 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1903 litres | 1792 litres | |
| Mazda Tribute has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Escape. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Escape. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Escape has
| |