Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 203 HP | 136 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 262 NM | 176 - 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.7 seconds | 7.7 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 11.8 | 9.1 - 10.1 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Tribute has 59 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 540 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |