Mazda Tribute 2004 vs Ford Maverick 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 203 HP | 124 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 262 NM | 175 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 10.7 seconds | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 11.8 | 9.8 - 12.8 | |
|
On average, the Mazda Tribute petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Maverick. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute is 1 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Tribute has 524 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Mazda Tribute uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Maverick has
| |