Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 197 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 265 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.8 | 7.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda Tribute is larger. Mazda Tribute is 20 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Tribute has 221 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda Tribute uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 336 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`992 | ~ 1`833 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |