Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Subaru Forester 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda Tribute also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 197 HP | 125 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 265 NM | 184 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Forester are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda Tribute. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.8 | 8.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mazda Tribute is 5 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Tribute is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2245 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 720 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Tribute is 0.6 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Mazda Tribute can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`992 kg | ~ 1`943 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`503 kg | ~ 1`424 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 489 kg | ~ 519 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |