Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Ford Maverick 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 197 HP | 124 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 265 NM | 175 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.8 | 9.8 - 12.8 | |
|
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Maverick. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute and Ford Maverick are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2245 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Mazda Tribute has 528 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`992 | ~ 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Tribute has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |