Mazda Tribute 2001 vs Ford Escape 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda Tribute
2001 - 2004
Ford Escape
2000 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 124 - 197 HP129 - 203 HP
Torque: 175 - 265 NM175 - 271 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 - 13.7 seconds8.8 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 12.87.1 - 11.7
Mazda Tribute petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Escape.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.39 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.71 m1.70 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Tribute and Ford Escape are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 457 litres934 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2245 litres1835 litres
Mazda Tribute has 477 litres less trunk space than the Ford Escape. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`992~ 1`878
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 3200no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda Tribute has
  • only petrol engines available
Ford Escape has
  • petrol and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv