Mazda RX-8 2005 vs Audi TT 2008

 
Mazda RX-8
2005 - 2009
Audi TT
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 215 HP160 HP
Torque: 216 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.2 seconds
Mazda RX-8 engine produces 55 HP more power than Audi TT, but torque is 34 NM less than Audi TT.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.86.7
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda RX-8 consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda RX-8 could require 615 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
640 km on highway1030 km on highway
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda RX-8) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.18 m
Width: 1.77 m1.84 m
Height: 1.34 m1.35 m
Mazda RX-8 is 25 cm longer than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 290 litres290 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
290 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi TT.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7481`660
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 40008400
Pros and Cons: Mazda RX-8 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv