Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Audi A5 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda RX-8) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 232 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda RX-8 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda RX-8 engine produces 42 HP more power than Audi A5, but torque is 184 NM less than Audi A5. Thanks to more power Mazda RX-8 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda RX-8 consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda RX-8 could require 900 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda RX-8 consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda RX-8) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mazda RX-8 2008 1.3 engine: This rotor motor is very specific and capricious. It will suit the true enthusiast who is prepared to put up with high fuel and oil consumption as well as relatively frequent maintenance and repair work. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Mazda RX-8 is smaller. Mazda RX-8 is 16 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Mazda RX-8 has 240 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Mazda RX-8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`732 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Audi A5 has
| |