Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Mazda RX-8 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 HP | 215 HP | |
Torque: | 216 NM | 216 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mazda RX-8 2008 engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda RX-8 2005, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 10.8 | |
The Mazda RX-8 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda RX-8 2008 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda RX-8 2008 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
590 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Mazda RX-8 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda RX-8 2008 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda RX-8 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 290 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | 290 litres | |
Mazda RX-8 2005 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda RX-8 2008 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mazda RX-8 2005. This could mean that the Mazda RX-8 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`748 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |