Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Mazda RX-8 2003

 
Mazda RX-8
2008 - 2012
Mazda RX-8
2003 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 212 HP250 HP
Torque: 216 NM216 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.5 seconds
Mazda RX-8 2008 engine produces 38 HP less power than Mazda RX-8 2003, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.511.4
The Mazda RX-8 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda RX-8 2008 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda RX-8 2008 could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 480 km in combined cycle530 km in combined cycle
590 km on highway680 km on highway
Mazda RX-8 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 160'000 km160'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years9 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.33 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.34 m1.33 m
Mazda RX-8 2008 is 14 cm longer than the Mazda RX-8 2003, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda RX-8 2008 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres290 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
290 litres290 litres
Mazda RX-8 2003 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda RX-8 2008 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mazda RX-8 2003. This could mean that the Mazda RX-8 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 38004000
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda RX-8 has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv