Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 232 HP | 192 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 211 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 12.7 | 10.8 - 11.4 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda RX-8 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda RX-8 2008 is 6 cm longer than the Mazda RX-8 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | 290 litres | |
|
Mazda RX-8 2003 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda RX-8 2008 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mazda RX-8 2003. This could mean that the Mazda RX-8 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`741 | ~ 1`779 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |