Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Honda CRX 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mazda RX-8 is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda CRX can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 - 232 HP | 125 - 160 HP | |
Torque: | 216 NM | 142 - 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 12.7 | 7.5 - 8.1 | |
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CRX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.26 m | |
Mazda RX-8 is larger. Mazda RX-8 is 46 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Mazda RX-8 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`741 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CRX has
| |