Mazda RX-8 2008 vs Honda CRX 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda RX-8 is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda CRX can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 - 232 HP | 125 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 142 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda RX-8 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CRX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 12.7 | 7.5 - 8.1 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CRX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Mazda RX-8 is larger. Mazda RX-8 is 46 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Mazda RX-8 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`741 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Honda CRX has
| |