Mazda RX-8 2003 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 - 250 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 - 220 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | 5.2 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 11.4 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda RX-8 is larger. Mazda RX-8 is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda RX-8 has more luggage capacity. Mazda RX-8 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |