Mazda RX-8 2003 vs Audi TT 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda RX-8 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 - 250 HP | 160 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 - 220 NM | 250 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | 4.6 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 11.4 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.35 m | |
| Mazda RX-8 is 22 cm longer than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Mazda RX-8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`763 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Audi TT has
| |