Mazda RX-8 2003 vs Alfa Romeo GT 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda RX-8 is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo GT can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.7 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 - 250 HP | 140 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 - 220 NM | 163 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | 6.7 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 11.4 | 6.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.36 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda RX-8 is 9 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo GT, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo GT has more luggage space. Mazda RX-8 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GT, which means Mazda RX-8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Alfa Romeo GT has
| |