Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-6 engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Mazda MX-6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-6 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-6 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda Xedos 9 | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda MX-6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is larger. Mazda MX-6 is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |