Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Ford Mustang 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-6 engine produces 31 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mazda MX-6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MX-6 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda MX-6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
| Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Mazda MX-6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |