Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Volvo V50 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MX-6
1991 - 2000
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Body: CoupeEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda MX-6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol)1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V50 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 116 - 167 HP100 - 230 HP
Torque: 173 - 221 NM150 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 10.4 seconds6.9 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.0 - 9.85.0 - 10.1
Mazda MX-6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.52 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.31 m1.46 m
Mazda MX-6 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 15 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres417 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda MX-6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight: ~ 1`523 kg~ 1`943 kg
Net weight:~ 1`163 kg~ 1`453 kg
Load capacity:~ 360 kg~ 490 kg
Mazda MX-6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than Volvo V50. Therefore, Volvo V50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10002400
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-6 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv