Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda MX-6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 167 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 - 221 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.4 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Mazda MX-6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is larger. Mazda MX-6 is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`523 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |