Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda MX-6 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 167 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 - 221 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.4 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, the Mazda MX-6 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is larger. Mazda MX-6 is 10 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Mazda MX-6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`523 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |