Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda MX-6 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 167 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 - 221 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.4 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| In general, Nissan 200 SX are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda MX-6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, the Mazda MX-6 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is larger. Mazda MX-6 is 10 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Mazda MX-6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`523 kg | ~ 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`163 kg | ~ 1`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 360 kg | ~ 430 kg | |
| Mazda MX-6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Nissan 200 SX. Therefore, Nissan 200 SX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |