Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda MX-6 is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 167 HP | 136 - 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 - 221 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.4 seconds | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 9.8 | 9.4 - 11.2 | |
|
Mazda MX-6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is larger, but lower. Mazda MX-6 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 420 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda MX-6 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Mazda MX-6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`523 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
| |