Mazda MX-5 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-5 engine produces 17 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Despite less power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.22 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 60 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
145 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`280 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |